同场地不同钻孔应变观测资料对比

Comparison of Strain Observation Data of Different Borehole Strain in the Same Site

  • 摘要: 对易县台同场地不同钻孔应变仪观测资料进行研究,分析易县台四分量钻孔应变的可靠性及其体应变的相关性,再分析不同钻孔应变观测对特殊事件的响应。结果显示:①易县台四分量钻孔应变观测自检程度不高,需进行实地相对标定;进行相对标定时,选取差分值数据有利于提高数据信度;②将四分量钻孔应变的S1+S3S2+S4 与体应变进行相关性分析,S1+S3 和体应变的皮尔森相关系数略高于S2+S4 与体应变的相关系数;③ 对于特殊事件响应方面,体应变和四分量钻孔应变两组面应变受抽水干扰均为张性变化,变化量高于体应变,体应变和四分量钻孔应变的 S1+S3 的相关系数要高于体应变和 S2+S4 的皮尔森相关系数;对同震响应方面,不同钻孔应变的同震响应一致性较好,且相关系数与震级大小有关。

     

    Abstract: This paper studies the observation data of different borehole strain gauges in the same site at Yixian Station, analyze the reliability of the four-component borehole strain and its correlation with body strain, and then analyze the response of different borehole strain observations to special events. The result shows that: 1) The 4-component borehole strain observation at Yixian Station is not very self-consistent and requires field relative calibration; when performing relative calibration, the selection of difference value data is beneficial to improve the reliability of the data; 2) The Pearson correlation coefficient of S1+S3 and body strain is slightly higher than that of S2+S4 and body strain; 3) In terms of response to special events, the volume strain and the four-component borehole strain show tensile changes due to pumping disturbance, and the variation is higher than the volume strain. The correlation coefficient between volume strain and S1+S3 is higher than volume strain and S2+S4. In terms of co-seismic response, the co-seismic response of different borehole strains is consistent, and the correlation coefficient is related to the magnitude of the earthquake.

     

/

返回文章
返回