杨航东. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土梁节点抗震性能[J]. 华北地震科学,2024, 42(3):26-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003−1375.2024.03.004.
引用本文: 杨航东. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土梁节点抗震性能[J]. 华北地震科学,2024, 42(3):26-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003−1375.2024.03.004.
YANG Hangdong. Seismic Performance Analysis of CFST Composite Column-reinforced Concrete Beam Joints[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,2024, 42(3):26-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003−1375.2024.03.004.
Citation: YANG Hangdong. Seismic Performance Analysis of CFST Composite Column-reinforced Concrete Beam Joints[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,2024, 42(3):26-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003−1375.2024.03.004.

钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土梁节点抗震性能

Seismic Performance Analysis of CFST Composite Column-reinforced Concrete Beam Joints

  • 摘要: 为研究钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土(RC)梁节点的抗震性能,以某地铁车站钢管混凝土柱为原型,基于等效刚度方法,将钢管混凝土叠合柱与钢管混凝土柱进行刚度等效计算,通过pushover得到其抗弯刚度,探究钢管混凝土柱与钢管混凝土叠合柱的力学性能;采用ABAQUS建立钢管混凝土柱-RC梁节点和钢管混凝土叠合柱-RC梁节点模型,通过既有文献试验数据验证节点模型的准确性,对两种节点的滞回特性、骨架曲线退化、刚度以及延性进行对比分析。结果表明:小轴压比作用下,钢管混凝土柱节点的耗能能力、滞回性能以及极限荷载都要优于钢管混凝土叠合柱节点;随着轴压比的增大,两者差别较小,在0.9轴压比时,钢管混凝土叠合柱节点的抗震性能优于钢管混凝土柱节点,采用钢管混凝土叠合柱-RC梁节点替换钢管混凝土柱-RC梁节点不会造成结构抗震性能的明显下降。

     

    Abstract: In order to further study the seismic performance of CFST composite column-reinforced concrete (RC) beam joints, we take a CFST column of a subway station as the prototype. Based on the equivalent stiffness method, the stiffness equivalent calculation of the composite column and the steel tube column was carried out. Its bending stiffness was obtained through pushover, and the mechanical properties of CFST columns and CFST composite columns were explored. The CFST column-RC beam joint model and the CFST composite column-RC beam joint model were established by using ABAQUS, and the accuracy of the node models were verified through existing literature experiments. The hysteretic characteristics, skeleton curve, stiffness degradation, and ductility ratio of the two joints were compared. The calculation results show that under the action of small axial compression ratios, the energy dissipation capacity, hysteresis performance, and ultimate load of CFST column joints are better than those of CFST composite column joints. With the increase of the axial compression ratio, the difference in energy consumption between the two joints is small. When the axial compression ratio is 0.9, the seismic performance of the CFST composite column joint is better than that of the CFST column joint. Replacing the CFST column-RC beam joint with the CFST composite column-RC beam joint will not cause a significant decrease in the structural seismic performance.

     

/

返回文章
返回